![\"\"](\"https:\/\/astrid.mager.net\/astrid_2015\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/logo.png\" "\\"logo\\""){kind=logo}
<\/a>The first one is the digital labor conference<\/a> in NYC organized by Trebor Scholz<\/a> and his team. It’s taking place at the New School and critically examines emerging forms of labor in digital environments – ranging from crowdsourced mini tasks for a few cents (e.g. Amazon Mechanical Turk) to mundane forms of labor performed by social media users on a daily basis (e.g. Facebook). Here’s the program<\/a>. I’m on the panel “search, data flows and vertical extraction<\/a>” and will be part of the final reflections. I’m pretty sure that’s gonna be a cool conference! \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\nThe second event is a workshop organized by Helga K\u00f6cher<\/a> and colleagues in Vienna. It aims at bringing together researchers interested in exploring and critically examining the growing economization of research practices and knowledge creation. It’s ambitious (utopian) goal is to create an interdisciplinary scientific advisory board for the European Union. In a first step, however, it wants to interest researchers from various disciplines, discuss implications of the neoliberal paradigm in academia, and (hopefully) develop strategies to overcome the dilemma. More information on the workshop here<\/a>.<\/p>\n This is my written input to support the project, while physically being in NYC:<\/p>\n Publish or perish<\/strong><\/em> I’d love to hear what you think about the increasing economization of both research & researchers!!
\nI do research on new media (Google & co) in sociopolitical contexts. Capitalist dynamics are central, but the stabilization of \u201cservice-for-profile\u201d business models in social practices (our own behavior) too. Similar dynamics may be observed in present knowledge societies. Contrary to data, publications are accumulated; contrary to capital, CVs, projects and jobs are generated \u2013 so the hope. Publish or perish has become a familiar expression. Peer-review publications, impact factors, citation indexes dominate our everyday life; especially at the beginning of the career. That is how one gets socialized in an academic system that prioritizes quantity instead of quality. As a consequence, knowledge production gets structured in smaller and smaller, \u201cproject-oriented\u201d portions. Implications go right into the heart of the epistemic core of science, but also of our research life. They create a research reality that provides neither security, nor satisfaction. Short-term contracts and the lack of career perspectives fuel the hunt after publications and mechanisms of self-exploitation. But why don\u2019t we step out of the treadmill of an academic enterprise that discharged knowledge and truth long ago? That makes us to accomplices of a neoliberal system oriented towards economic factors and getting rid of surplus workforce? Because we still believe in this system that promises us prizes and professorships if we work hard enough? But aren\u2019t these hopes inherent in the system; part of a competitive society that rewards the strongest (or the fastest quickly packing their stuff to start a job at the end of the world; without heavy luggage such as family or kids)? And what happens if the system fails and doesn\u2019t provide us with gratification for our efforts? Individual risk? I would call that into question. I hope the workshop will help to explore these questions and socialize the supposedly individual risk to some extent.<\/em><\/p>\n
\n